Comments on: Why Wikipedia rules Google SERPs? http://www.idealwebtools.com/blog/wikipedia-serp/ Blogging is fun Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:50:30 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: AjiNIMC http://www.idealwebtools.com/blog/wikipedia-serp/#comment-10751 AjiNIMC Sat, 14 Apr 2007 15:10:33 +0000 http://www.idealwebtools.com/blog/wikipedia-serp/#comment-10751 Thanks Carsten for the contribution. >> a lot of it is also of high quality and well written The Site Wide content is great, so it is gaining the site wide reputation for content as well. I have seen people spending almost 25 minutes with Wikipedia articles to understand it, so on page impression is also great. Overall its a deadly combination. Thanks Carsten for the contribution.

>> a lot of it is also of high quality and well written
The Site Wide content is great, so it is gaining the site wide reputation for content as well.

I have seen people spending almost 25 minutes with Wikipedia articles to understand it, so on page impression is also great. Overall its a deadly combination.

]]> By: Carsten Cumbrowski http://www.idealwebtools.com/blog/wikipedia-serp/#comment-10743 Carsten Cumbrowski Sat, 14 Apr 2007 13:07:05 +0000 http://www.idealwebtools.com/blog/wikipedia-serp/#comment-10743 Add to that the fact that the pages are content rich and for the most part unique content and a lot of it is also of high quality and well written. "Featured Articles" were edited so much and proof read as if there is no tomorrow, that no company that provides content, editors and proof reader services could compete with it. Then the things, which you already stated, which come on top of that and it is understandable why search engines fell in love with W! Crawlers, indexer and Ranking Algo and Programs must "feel" like "<a>die Made im Speck</a>". The site represents the reincarnation of Search Engine Guidelines for SEO and Web Designers. It is like, if you would envision your dream partner, carefully "constructed" piece by piece only from the best parts in your mind and suddenly bumped into it one day. :) Cheers! Add to that the fact that the pages are content rich and for the most part unique content and a lot of it is also of high quality and well written. “Featured Articles” were edited so much and proof read as if there is no tomorrow, that no company that provides content, editors and proof reader services could compete with it.

Then the things, which you already stated, which come on top of that and it is understandable why search engines fell in love with W!

Crawlers, indexer and Ranking Algo and Programs must “feel” like “die Made im Speck“. The site represents the reincarnation of Search Engine Guidelines for SEO and Web Designers. It is like, if you would envision your dream partner, carefully “constructed” piece by piece only from the best parts in your mind and suddenly bumped into it one day. :)

Cheers!

]]> By: Raju http://www.idealwebtools.com/blog/wikipedia-serp/#comment-5363 Raju Sun, 11 Mar 2007 17:50:45 +0000 http://www.idealwebtools.com/blog/wikipedia-serp/#comment-5363 I thought its more complex, some kind of preferance for wikipedia. I thought its more complex, some kind of preferance for wikipedia.

]]>