<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guruji.com - Indian Google? GYMA Comparison chart</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.idealwebtools.com/blog/guruji-com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.idealwebtools.com/blog/guruji-com/</link>
	<description>Blogging is fun</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 03:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roadside romeo</title>
		<link>http://www.idealwebtools.com/blog/guruji-com/#comment-413880</link>
		<dc:creator>Roadside romeo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 07:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idealwebtools.com/blog/gurujicom-indian-google/#comment-413880</guid>
		<description>Hi friends ,

For my point of view guruji is a cool website and the info it is giving is awesome but when i first visited the site it was as if i am seeing a desi google (nothing different from google).i think the site shud change the way it looks.

Regards
Road Side Romeo
http://www.roadsideromeo.net</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi friends ,</p>
<p>For my point of view guruji is a cool website and the info it is giving is awesome but when i first visited the site it was as if i am seeing a desi google (nothing different from google).i think the site shud change the way it looks.</p>
<p>Regards<br />
Road Side Romeo<br />
<a href="http://www.roadsideromeo.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.roadsideromeo.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: supernatural-Peru</title>
		<link>http://www.idealwebtools.com/blog/guruji-com/#comment-730</link>
		<dc:creator>supernatural-Peru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 12:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idealwebtools.com/blog/gurujicom-indian-google/#comment-730</guid>
		<description>Yes! you are right Edmond. Social Bookmarkting has worked for me as well. 
It seems tags and keywords are treated the same... (till now)

cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes! you are right Edmond. Social Bookmarkting has worked for me as well.<br />
It seems tags and keywords are treated the same&#8230; (till now)</p>
<p>cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rajesh</title>
		<link>http://www.idealwebtools.com/blog/guruji-com/#comment-644</link>
		<dc:creator>Rajesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2006 09:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idealwebtools.com/blog/gurujicom-indian-google/#comment-644</guid>
		<description>I got a feel of searching thru Blogsearch.google.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got a feel of searching thru Blogsearch.google.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AjiNIMC</title>
		<link>http://www.idealwebtools.com/blog/guruji-com/#comment-643</link>
		<dc:creator>AjiNIMC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2006 09:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idealwebtools.com/blog/gurujicom-indian-google/#comment-643</guid>
		<description>Also since yahoo owns del.icio.us social bookmarking goes more and more important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also since yahoo owns del.icio.us social bookmarking goes more and more important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edmond dantes</title>
		<link>http://www.idealwebtools.com/blog/guruji-com/#comment-642</link>
		<dc:creator>Edmond dantes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2006 08:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idealwebtools.com/blog/gurujicom-indian-google/#comment-642</guid>
		<description>I think that yahoo is not reliable. 
Another interesting thing that You have to analyze is social bookmarking. If You add Your pages to those sites You can climb the tops of link popularity...
Nowadays, where is the difference between TAGS and keywords??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that yahoo is not reliable.<br />
Another interesting thing that You have to analyze is social bookmarking. If You add Your pages to those sites You can climb the tops of link popularity&#8230;<br />
Nowadays, where is the difference between TAGS and keywords??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AjiNIMC</title>
		<link>http://www.idealwebtools.com/blog/guruji-com/#comment-641</link>
		<dc:creator>AjiNIMC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2006 02:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idealwebtools.com/blog/gurujicom-indian-google/#comment-641</guid>
		<description>Thanks GJ, these domains were ignored except idealwebtools.com and this blog, I was surprised to see dead sites ranking in Yahoo. It is about an active site (fresh content) and dead site (unchanged content), It is about content optimization (0catch site) and links (this blog), it is about DMOZ listing (0catch).

I will surely do more analysis on it. Thanks for your comments GJ, it is highly appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks GJ, these domains were ignored except idealwebtools.com and this blog, I was surprised to see dead sites ranking in Yahoo. It is about an active site (fresh content) and dead site (unchanged content), It is about content optimization (0catch site) and links (this blog), it is about DMOZ listing (0catch).</p>
<p>I will surely do more analysis on it. Thanks for your comments GJ, it is highly appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Khurram Ali</title>
		<link>http://www.idealwebtools.com/blog/guruji-com/#comment-640</link>
		<dc:creator>Khurram Ali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 22:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idealwebtools.com/blog/gurujicom-indian-google/#comment-640</guid>
		<description>SERP and rankings are never a good comparision. As rankings can be influenced and can change without notice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SERP and rankings are never a good comparision. As rankings can be influenced and can change without notice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Junky</title>
		<link>http://www.idealwebtools.com/blog/guruji-com/#comment-639</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Junky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 19:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idealwebtools.com/blog/gurujicom-indian-google/#comment-639</guid>
		<description>I did a search â€œaji issacâ€ on the four search engines you have above and added quotes and then no quotes.
The only results that checged were Googles results for each search. Google seems to be a bit more touchy about exact phrases.
I have no background as to this search term on these sites. Like dates when the word was added or know anything about the site they are on.

Do you have a common word to search for other than the name or were you looking for something particular?
aji issac could come up with some real skewed results since it is a name and not left in quotes.
Searching for something unique would give better results if we are really looking for something as a test here.

For a real investigaiton you have to have a set of 3 search words/phrases to compare results. You won't be able to just go on the first thing you see.

That's just my opnion though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did a search â€œaji issacâ€ on the four search engines you have above and added quotes and then no quotes.<br />
The only results that checged were Googles results for each search. Google seems to be a bit more touchy about exact phrases.<br />
I have no background as to this search term on these sites. Like dates when the word was added or know anything about the site they are on.</p>
<p>Do you have a common word to search for other than the name or were you looking for something particular?<br />
aji issac could come up with some real skewed results since it is a name and not left in quotes.<br />
Searching for something unique would give better results if we are really looking for something as a test here.</p>
<p>For a real investigaiton you have to have a set of 3 search words/phrases to compare results. You won&#8217;t be able to just go on the first thing you see.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s just my opnion though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Junky</title>
		<link>http://www.idealwebtools.com/blog/guruji-com/#comment-638</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Junky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 19:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.idealwebtools.com/blog/gurujicom-indian-google/#comment-638</guid>
		<description>Guruji.com - Indian Google?

Not even close to being a problem for any search engine unless DMOZ vanishes.

Look at the bottom of the page where DMOZ is
Example: http://dir.guruji.com/indianDir/89668.html


Wanna see the same content?
guruji --&#62; http://dir.guruji.com/indianDir/161620.html
DMOZ --&#62; http://dmoz.org/Regional/Asia/India/Gujarat/Arts_and_Entertainment/


There are many scripts that let you download and use DMOZ to start with and also keep your site up to date with anything DMOZ does.

They have nothing special happening or a huge list of engineers doing anything great. Itâ€™s just another DMOZ replicated site with additions offered by web surfers. Their search feature for the site is simply searching this DMOZ replicated directory.

They have no special robot traveling all over the web looking for sites.
Someone submits a site that DMOZ didn't already have and then the robot gets a meta description and title from the submitted site on its own.

Itâ€™s a copycat site to look like something it isnâ€™t
Guruji.com needs to be a real resource if it wants to be treated as one. As of right now all the engineers they brag about in their About Us page can be done by one script kiddy.

The quote from their site is:
"Our team of young, dynamic and passionate engineers from India's premier institutes like the IITs,IISc and other top engineering colleges, is working arduously to make this product better each day." 

that's funny stuff there.

Google Junky</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guruji.com - Indian Google?</p>
<p>Not even close to being a problem for any search engine unless DMOZ vanishes.</p>
<p>Look at the bottom of the page where DMOZ is<br />
Example: <a href="http://dir.guruji.com/indianDir/89668.html" rel="nofollow">http://dir.guruji.com/indianDir/89668.html</a></p>
<p>Wanna see the same content?<br />
guruji &#8211;&gt; <a href="http://dir.guruji.com/indianDir/161620.html" rel="nofollow">http://dir.guruji.com/indianDir/161620.html</a><br />
DMOZ &#8211;&gt; <a href="http://dmoz.org/Regional/Asia/India/Gujarat/Arts_and_Entertainment/" rel="nofollow">http://dmoz.org/Regional/Asia/India/Gujarat/Arts_and_Entertainment/</a></p>
<p>There are many scripts that let you download and use DMOZ to start with and also keep your site up to date with anything DMOZ does.</p>
<p>They have nothing special happening or a huge list of engineers doing anything great. Itâ€™s just another DMOZ replicated site with additions offered by web surfers. Their search feature for the site is simply searching this DMOZ replicated directory.</p>
<p>They have no special robot traveling all over the web looking for sites.<br />
Someone submits a site that DMOZ didn&#8217;t already have and then the robot gets a meta description and title from the submitted site on its own.</p>
<p>Itâ€™s a copycat site to look like something it isnâ€™t<br />
Guruji.com needs to be a real resource if it wants to be treated as one. As of right now all the engineers they brag about in their About Us page can be done by one script kiddy.</p>
<p>The quote from their site is:<br />
&#8220;Our team of young, dynamic and passionate engineers from India&#8217;s premier institutes like the IITs,IISc and other top engineering colleges, is working arduously to make this product better each day.&#8221; </p>
<p>that&#8217;s funny stuff there.</p>
<p>Google Junky</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
