![]() | I am Aji Issac Mathew also known as AjiNIMC at various forums. I am webby and I think webby, being a part time blogger, this blog is a documentation of my experiences and my learning. Blog Stats (06 June 2008): There are currently 306 posts and 1100 comments (and 397,307 spam comments), contained within 17 categories. | ![]() |
| I am into professional Web Marketing services which includes Web marketing strategies, SEO/SEM, Content Designing, Web Designing for usability, conversion improvement and various other things. There are limited availability per month. We don't take too many clients but we make sure that all our clients get their share of success. I worked on in-house sites for over 5 years, now is the time to help others with my experience. I have a great team helping me achieve this. A very creative and experienced team. Contact aji.issac (at the rate) digitalavenues.com and get your share of success. |
Home > Permalink Guruji.com - Indian Google? GYMA Comparison chart | |
Oct
13 Who should read this: Though it’s title is guruji.com but it is a small analysis of Search engine working. Anyone who is interested in search engine optimization can analyze it and understand SEs working. Small keyphrases and small data sample give bigger clues. Interesting factor is DMOZ listing and Content value. If you want me to do something with the sites let me know I may do it to help you analyse. I was contacted to review guruji.com supposedly an Indian replacement for Google. Here is my small analysis for different search engines,
What did I expect? Analysis
One big factor I think I should spent some time and do a better analysis as I know what I did with all these sites. Also I know that there is no Aji Issac who has a better online presence. You too can do some analysis and put your expert views here. | |
| This post was written by AjiNIMC aka Web Kotler at 11:43 pm under category Online Marketing(Permalink) | ![]() |
|
| |
|
| |
8 Comments »
| |
Guruji.com - Indian Google?
Not even close to being a problem for any search engine unless DMOZ vanishes.
Look at the bottom of the page where DMOZ is
Example: http://dir.guruji.com/indianDir/89668.html
Wanna see the same content?
guruji –> http://dir.guruji.com/indianDir/161620.html
DMOZ –> http://dmoz.org/Regional/Asia/India/Gujarat/Arts_and_Entertainment/
There are many scripts that let you download and use DMOZ to start with and also keep your site up to date with anything DMOZ does.
They have nothing special happening or a huge list of engineers doing anything great. It’s just another DMOZ replicated site with additions offered by web surfers. Their search feature for the site is simply searching this DMOZ replicated directory.
They have no special robot traveling all over the web looking for sites.
Someone submits a site that DMOZ didn’t already have and then the robot gets a meta description and title from the submitted site on its own.
It’s a copycat site to look like something it isn’t
Guruji.com needs to be a real resource if it wants to be treated as one. As of right now all the engineers they brag about in their About Us page can be done by one script kiddy.
The quote from their site is:
“Our team of young, dynamic and passionate engineers from India’s premier institutes like the IITs,IISc and other top engineering colleges, is working arduously to make this product better each day.”
that’s funny stuff there.
Google Junky
Google Junky on October 14, 2006 - 12:39 am @ 12:39 am
I did a search “aji issac†on the four search engines you have above and added quotes and then no quotes.
The only results that checged were Googles results for each search. Google seems to be a bit more touchy about exact phrases.
I have no background as to this search term on these sites. Like dates when the word was added or know anything about the site they are on.
Do you have a common word to search for other than the name or were you looking for something particular?
aji issac could come up with some real skewed results since it is a name and not left in quotes.
Searching for something unique would give better results if we are really looking for something as a test here.
For a real investigaiton you have to have a set of 3 search words/phrases to compare results. You won’t be able to just go on the first thing you see.
That’s just my opnion though.
Google Junky on October 14, 2006 - 12:55 am @ 12:55 am
SERP and rankings are never a good comparision. As rankings can be influenced and can change without notice.
Khurram Ali on October 14, 2006 - 3:05 am @ 3:05 am
Thanks GJ, these domains were ignored except idealwebtools.com and this blog, I was surprised to see dead sites ranking in Yahoo. It is about an active site (fresh content) and dead site (unchanged content), It is about content optimization (0catch site) and links (this blog), it is about DMOZ listing (0catch).
I will surely do more analysis on it. Thanks for your comments GJ, it is highly appreciated.
AjiNIMC on October 14, 2006 - 7:23 am @ 7:23 am
I think that yahoo is not reliable.
Another interesting thing that You have to analyze is social bookmarking. If You add Your pages to those sites You can climb the tops of link popularity…
Nowadays, where is the difference between TAGS and keywords??
Edmond dantes on October 14, 2006 - 1:14 pm @ 1:14 pm
Also since yahoo owns del.icio.us social bookmarking goes more and more important.
AjiNIMC on October 14, 2006 - 2:00 pm @ 2:00 pm
I got a feel of searching thru Blogsearch.google.com
Rajesh on October 14, 2006 - 2:45 pm @ 2:45 pm
Yes! you are right Edmond. Social Bookmarkting has worked for me as well.
It seems tags and keywords are treated the same… (till now)
cheers
supernatural-Peru on October 19, 2006 - 5:09 pm @ 5:09 pm