"I am webby and I think webby" - AjiNIMC aka Aji Issac Mathew - "I thought and I wrote".

 AjiNIMC logo - Aji Issac Mathew I am Aji Issac Mathew also known as AjiNIMC at various forums. I am webby and I think webby, being a part time blogger, this blog is a documentation of my experiences and my learning.
Blog Stats (06 June 2008): There are currently 306 posts and 1100 comments (and 397,307 spam comments), contained within 17 categories.
RSS for Aji Issac Mathew's blog 
  I am into professional Web Marketing services which includes Web marketing strategies, SEO/SEM, Content Designing, Web Designing for usability, conversion improvement and various other things. There are limited availability per month. We don't take too many clients but we make sure that all our clients get their share of success. I worked on in-house sites for over 5 years, now is the time to help others with my experience. I have a great team helping me achieve this. A very creative and experienced team. Contact aji.issac (at the rate) digitalavenues.com and get your share of success.  

 Home >

Archive for May, 2007

Live Review for linkedzone.com

Thursday, May 3rd, 2007

As mentioned earlier I reviewed linkedzone.com. I did a live recording for linkedzone.com and converted it to a video. It took me almost an hour to do it. I did this last weekend. I tried to upload it at youtube, yahoo videos and many other video sharing sites without any success (reasons of failure: 25 mins video is not allowed, some codec problems and few more reasons). I am happy that finally it is uploaded successfully.

(more…)

How to send .exe files through gmail

Wednesday, May 2nd, 2007

I wanted to pass VNC setup file to my friend as I wanted to show him few things remotely. I was not able to send it through gmail due to gmail security issues (Gmail is very secure and very powerful, see how I handle over 100 mails a day with Google tricks). Then I zipped it and tried but the same message came back.

So how can we send it then? It is very easy when you know else it is as tough as running Bill Gates OS. Here is the simple trick

Follow the steps for a smooth sail

  1. Sender End: Rename the file to some other extension. I renamed it to UltraVNC-Setup.removeit-exe-removeit
  2. Receiver end: Just rename it by removing removeit parts. Very simple but very helpful.

Take care and read my other posts on gmail, orkut and various HR and technical issues.

Canonicalization Issues - Why yes and why no

Wednesday, May 2nd, 2007

One of my colleague asked me to help him with URL Canonicalization. I had mentioned about Canonicalization (both at domain level and URL level earlier), I think I did it in company Intranet. I will find it and add it to this post. He also referred me to a post where it was mentioned. I generally end up writing big comments on various blogs, so decided to post it here instead.

Redirection from /index.html to /. Example if someone types http://www.idealwebtools.com/index.html we will take them to http://www.idealwebtools.com/.

Why I might not do it

  • Reason1: It is very much natural
  • Reason2: Almost 99% of the website will never do it, so it is a problem at google’s end, they need to solve it.
  • Reason 3: Very important, when a person is coming to index.html I am redirecting it to / which is making my customer wait.

Why I might do it?

  • Reason 1: Only from links point of view and to help Google. SEO benefits (may be)
  • Reason 2: Technically both these files can be different too.

SEO advices from Matt Cutts
He says google does it work but still fails sometimes.

Q: What is a canonical url? Do you have to use such a weird word, anyway?
A: Sorry that it’s a strange word; that’s what we call it around Google. Canonicalization is the process of picking the best url when there are several choices, and it usually refers to home pages. For example, most people would consider these the same urls:

* www.example.com
* example.com/
* www.example.com/index.html
* example.com/home.asp

But technically all of these urls are different. A web server could return completely different content for all the urls above. When Google “canonicalizes” a url, we try to pick the url that seems like the best representative from that set.

More at http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-advice-url-canonicalization/
and http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/canonicalization-update/

Let me think more carefully about it. What is your opinion, should we do it?

Some helpful links

  1. Master guide for canonicalization by JD (he is a gem, he helped me a lot with htaccess issues) -
    http://www.webmasterworld.com/apache/3208525.htm

Some tests

  1. Linking to mattcutts blog using different URL, first with id =2
  2. Second with id=3
  3. Second with id=4
  4. Second with id=5
  5. Linking to with index.php
  6. Linking to with index.php and id =2
  7. Linking to with index.php and id =3
You are visitor number